Precise Data. Defensible Legal Basis. No Ambiguity.
We turn legal & privacy requirements into concrete control points: documented, auditable, immediately enforceable.
You advise on GDPR, platform risk or digital compliance and see the gap between written opinion and lived data practice. That precise gap is where we operate: structured, versioned, evidence-ready.
The Operative Interface:
Law × Data Architecture
We translate legal expectations into technical control points and lean, purpose‑bounded data pathways. Three structural pillars sustain every activation:
Structured, Purpose‑Bounded Collection
Event & attribution modelling with disciplined capture: purpose, category, lawful basis, retention horizon. No implicit framework auto‑capture.
Technical Guardrails
Consent gating, server‑side pseudonymisation layer, input validation, hashing & scope isolation. No shadow pipelines.
Documentation & Audit Capability
Business process → event mapping, versioned change log, schema diffs, DPIA & RoPA‑ready artefacts, fully traceable.
Why Partnership with Legal is Essential
We deliver the technical architecture; you deliver legal evaluation, together producing a DPIA that is defensible, audit‑ready and strategically useful.
- Higher Implementation Yield: Legal guidance translated into deployable artefacts (events, validators, policies) reduces interpretation loss.
- Avoidance of Over‑Blocking: Early minimisation & granular categorisation preserve lawful measurement without blind spots.
- Accelerated Review Cycles: Standardised data sheets (purpose, fields, TTL, access) reduce clarification loops.
- Change Stability: Versioned schemas + deployment gates prevent ungoverned scope expansion.
- DPIA by Design: Architecture continuously emits purpose, flow, retention & risk artefacts, regulator & client ready.
Engagement Model with Legal Teams
Transparent, clearly documented phases; each produces actionable artefacts. No abstraction theatre.
- Initial Alignment (30–40 min): Mandate context, risk appetite, data sources, cross‑border vectors, legacy constraints.
- Gap & Risk Snapshot: Collection → processing → activation → reporting. Stated vs. actual flows.
- Operational Blueprint: Event & consent architecture, system diagram, minimisation logic, responsibilities, quick wins.
- Review & Refinement: Reconciliation with legal stance, flagged contention points, decision papers.
- Implementation & Evidence: PR checks, event validator, change log, control points.
- Ongoing Stewardship (optional): Schema deviation monitoring, new tooling, legal tech signals, impact reports.
Typical High-Value Scenarios
- SaaS Unicorns & IPO Preparation: Attribution fragmentation, investor pressure for evidence-grade metrics, cross-border data transfers. Objective: defensible measurement chain that withstands diligence & regulator scrutiny.
- Global Marketplaces: Multi-region sub-processor chains, conflicting national regimes, fragmented event capture. Objective: unified, audit-ready architecture across jurisdictions.
- Enterprise Programmes (Fortune 500 / DAX): Legacy stack complexity, competing stakeholder agendas, regulator attention at board level. Objective: one defensible data architecture, globally consistent and regulator-proof.
- M&A and Private Equity Deals: Historic retention issues, missing evidentiary trail, high data-risk in diligence. Objective: risk minimisation, DPIA-ready artefacts, credible post-merger roadmap.
- Regulated Industries (Finance, Health, Energy): Stricter supervisory oversight, multi-layer vendor chains, board liability. Objective: demonstrable compliance posture with measurable commercial upside.
Request a Conversation
Entry into collaboration begins with one structured exchange.
Please include your industry, organisation size, system landscape (tracking / consent / CRM) and the single most material constraint you want resolved.
We respond with a clear path forward: focused, practical, GDPR-aligned.
15 years combined in digital marketing & software engineering with legal & commercial literacy; proven risk assessment delivery.